You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
My perception is that windows treats shortcuts as separate files. They should be counted as a .lnk file, IMO.
We have a similar situation os macOS, with shortcuts created using the Finder. In this case, however, on the terminal they behave almost like links, having the the same file name and extension as the original file.
On Unix/linux, symbolic links are meant to be used as in-place representations of a file that may also be linked elsewhere. I would count them as regular files in this context. I believe thats what is happening already in our current code base, right?
Example with symbolic link
Example with Windows shortcut
Should I pay attention to such files or count them on a par with others?
Originally posted by @NataliaBondarenko in #84 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: