Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Obfuscation (formerly "Anonymization") v2 #3181

Closed
jrtricafort opened this issue Jul 26, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Obfuscation (formerly "Anonymization") v2 #3181

jrtricafort opened this issue Jul 26, 2018 · 3 comments
Labels
Community feedback A user of platform has provided feedback on this issue directly. Community: feedback
Milestone

Comments

@jrtricafort
Copy link
Contributor

jrtricafort commented Jul 26, 2018

Overview

Improve upon Anonymization v1, which was rolled into production in Cycle 7, July 2018.
v1: #2685

Who is it for? Who are the users?

  • Users who want to anonymize certain posts

What privacy impacts does it have?

  • Increases privacy by reducing data availability and improving obfuscation funcitonality.
  • Terms of Service would need to be updated
  • Survey Settings description UI would need to be updated

Requirements/New Functionality

Currently here is the new functionality we have for this epic. For most up-to-date info, see child issues of this epic. Information in child issues supercedes this high-level summary:

  1. Ability to hide post author information from admins as well as non-admins
  2. Ability to obfuscate location based on this best practice https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/SAR7/SAR7.pdf ( @willdoran and @Shadrock have more detail on this )
  3. UX Issue - time obfuscation and sorting in data mode (see thread in #plat-anonymization for more detail, in absence of sub-issue)

Who will this be deployed to?

  • Currently, no plans to have this be feature gated. Similar to Anonymization v1, will be turned on to all production deployments by default. Need to verify this.

What documentation needs to change?

  • Anonymization feature support documentation

Test script

Who will test this?

Where will this be deployed and tested?

Deployment

Does this deploy new services?
Do the new services have health checks?
Can this be feature flagged and deployed disabled?

Dependencies

Aha! Link: https://ushahiditeam.aha.io/features/PROD-308

@jrtricafort
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @katymoney27 @justinscherer @rowasc @willdoran creating this placeholder epic. This is not yet prioritized/planned.

@Erioldoesdesign
Copy link

Adding in comments from my MOZOL 6 project (finally)

Platform user says: The admins find it useful to know precise location of a report/response in order to lobby local authorities/government for better provisions (more street lighting, remove bushes etc.) in high volume response/post areas or extreme instances. Allows them to take direct action.
There is no need to know a persons name but certain demo graphics are very useful for informing policy.
Admins across BWV all know the details given in a post and there are policies in place internally to safeguard that information. Within this org there is no need to have multiple levels of access to users data at the moment.

@Erioldoesdesign Erioldoesdesign added the Community feedback A user of platform has provided feedback on this issue directly. label Feb 13, 2019
@Erioldoesdesign Erioldoesdesign added the Community Task Issues that the Ushahidi OSS community is encouraged to contribute to label Mar 22, 2019
@rowasc rowasc added this to the Parking Lot milestone Sep 4, 2020
@tuxpiper
Copy link
Member

Confirming alive and relevant.

This is meant as an improvement on the current level of functionality given by this feature.

@Angamanga Angamanga removed the Community Task Issues that the Ushahidi OSS community is encouraged to contribute to label Mar 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Community feedback A user of platform has provided feedback on this issue directly. Community: feedback
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants