You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Abstract: "An idea is nothing more nor less than a new combination of old elements"(Young, J.W.). The widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) andpublicly available ChatGPT have marked a significant turning point in theintegration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into people's everyday lives. Thisstudy explores the capability of LLMs in generating novel research ideas basedon information from research papers. We conduct a thorough examination of 4LLMs in five domains (e.g., Chemistry, Computer, Economics, Medical, andPhysics). We found that the future research ideas generated by Claude-2 andGPT-4 are more aligned with the author's perspective than GPT-3.5 and Gemini.We also found that Claude-2 generates more diverse future research ideas thanGPT-4, GPT-3.5, and Gemini 1.0. We further performed a human evaluation of thenovelty, relevancy, and feasibility of the generated future research ideas.This investigation offers insights into the evolving role of LLMs in ideageneration, highlighting both its capability and limitations. Our workcontributes to the ongoing efforts in evaluating and utilizing language modelsfor generating future research ideas. We make our datasets and codes publiclyavailable.
Reasoning: produce the answer. We start by examining the title, which mentions "Large Language Models" and their role in scientific research. This indicates a focus on language models. Next, we look at the abstract, which discusses the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4, GPT-3.5, and Claude-2 in generating research ideas across various domains. The study evaluates the performance of these models in terms of novelty, relevancy, and feasibility of the generated ideas. The repeated mention of LLMs and specific models like GPT-4 confirms that the paper is centered around language models.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Paper: Can Large Language Models Unlock Novel Scientific Research Ideas?
Authors: Sandeep Kumar, Tirthankar Ghosal, Vinayak Goyal, Asif Ekbal
Abstract: "An idea is nothing more nor less than a new combination of old elements"(Young, J.W.). The widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) andpublicly available ChatGPT have marked a significant turning point in theintegration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into people's everyday lives. Thisstudy explores the capability of LLMs in generating novel research ideas basedon information from research papers. We conduct a thorough examination of 4LLMs in five domains (e.g., Chemistry, Computer, Economics, Medical, andPhysics). We found that the future research ideas generated by Claude-2 andGPT-4 are more aligned with the author's perspective than GPT-3.5 and Gemini.We also found that Claude-2 generates more diverse future research ideas thanGPT-4, GPT-3.5, and Gemini 1.0. We further performed a human evaluation of thenovelty, relevancy, and feasibility of the generated future research ideas.This investigation offers insights into the evolving role of LLMs in ideageneration, highlighting both its capability and limitations. Our workcontributes to the ongoing efforts in evaluating and utilizing language modelsfor generating future research ideas. We make our datasets and codes publiclyavailable.
Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.06185
Reasoning: produce the answer. We start by examining the title, which mentions "Large Language Models" and their role in scientific research. This indicates a focus on language models. Next, we look at the abstract, which discusses the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4, GPT-3.5, and Claude-2 in generating research ideas across various domains. The study evaluates the performance of these models in terms of novelty, relevancy, and feasibility of the generated ideas. The repeated mention of LLMs and specific models like GPT-4 confirms that the paper is centered around language models.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: