Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check floodplains for all towns #50

Closed
9 of 11 tasks
nickrsan opened this issue May 16, 2016 · 7 comments
Closed
9 of 11 tasks

Check floodplains for all towns #50

nickrsan opened this issue May 16, 2016 · 7 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@nickrsan
Copy link
Member

nickrsan commented May 16, 2016

  • niobrara
  • odanah
  • pattonsburg
  • rhineland
  • shawneetown
  • silex
  • soldiers_grove
  • valmeyer
  • gays_mills
  • english
  • leavenworth
@nickrsan nickrsan self-assigned this May 16, 2016
@nickrsan nickrsan modified the milestones: final_model, May17 May 16, 2016
@nickrsan
Copy link
Member Author

Flagging Odanah - floodplain seems to now pass through or near old location

@nickrsan
Copy link
Member Author

Silex worth checking - 3 of 8 town parcels contact floodplain. Should we be using minimum/maximum, or mean floodplain distances? Maybe max since we're using a touching measure. If part of the parcel is in town, but part is also out of the floodplain, we want to measure that.

@nickrsan
Copy link
Member Author

Valmeyer is buggered. Floodplain only on other side of river.

@nickrsan
Copy link
Member Author

Odanah specifically excluded from FIRM maps because on reservation. Going to digitize a polygon, but right way to handle this is probably to use Hazus.

@nickrsan
Copy link
Member Author

Looks like Valmeyer wasn't missing because of my processing, but because of the NFHL. Appears to be present in paper FIRMs, so will need to digitize it.

@nickrsan
Copy link
Member Author

Valmeyer is mostly digitized, but still needs more to flesh out the county. All towns need to be checked not just for the town touching, but whether or not NFHL covers it completely.

@nickrsan
Copy link
Member Author

Closing this because a broader ticket (data completeness checks, #54 supercedes it)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant