You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since I don't know much about scalafix not sure how hard, or even impossible, this will be...
But, it would be great to warn / error if someone tries to leak a Resource using pure or delay inside use; which is a somewhat common beginner mistake.
Maybe a best effort that tries to catch common variations like ra.use(a => a.pure[F]) or ra.use(IO.apply) can be enough?
Another idea would be to warn if use returns an F[A] rather than some F[B](meaning the same type of the Resource), since on the surface it seems that would never be a good idea; but I may be being too naive.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Another idea would be to warn if use returns an F[A] rather than some F[B](meaning the same type of the Resource)
FWIW I really like this idea. Whereas a "pure" based fix can probably be implemented as a syntactic rule, inspecting the inferred types will require a semantic rule.
Since I don't know much about scalafix not sure how hard, or even impossible, this will be...
But, it would be great to warn / error if someone tries to leak a
Resource
usingpure
ordelay
insideuse
; which is a somewhat common beginner mistake.Maybe a best effort that tries to catch common variations like
ra.use(a => a.pure[F])
orra.use(IO.apply)
can be enough?Another idea would be to warn if
use
returns anF[A]
rather than someF[B]
(meaning the same type of theResource
), since on the surface it seems that would never be a good idea; but I may be being too naive.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: