Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

README: should we mention py-tree-sitter-languages? #120

Closed
Akuli opened this issue Sep 7, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

README: should we mention py-tree-sitter-languages? #120

Akuli opened this issue Sep 7, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
wontfix This will not be worked on

Comments

@Akuli
Copy link
Contributor

Akuli commented Sep 7, 2022

https://github.com/grantjenks/py-tree-sitter-languages distributes language binaries for py-tree-sitter. Together with #117, they make it possible to use py-tree-sitter without having a C compiler installed.

We should probably update our README to mention this possibility, as it currently claims that "you do need to have a C compiler installed". I don't want to do it in #117 because that PR is already big enough.
@ObserverOfTime
Copy link
Member

Parsers can now easily build wheels themselves with the updated bindings in tree-sitter/tree-sitter@9e5bf65.

@ObserverOfTime ObserverOfTime closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Feb 26, 2024
@ObserverOfTime ObserverOfTime added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Feb 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Akuli @ObserverOfTime