You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We are at a fork in the road with CSS. Unless browsers are going to support custom CSS properties, or Web Components pioneers it (doesn't look like they care), we should not be in the business of mixing standard CSS with our flavor of CSS.
Options (not necessarily mutually exclusive):
Put the content in external files, read it with Ajax and use custom parser. Also remove from <style> tags... if we really want the stylesheet inline, we can throw it into a custom script node or use CDATA in an element or yadayada.
Use traditional CSS syntax, OR
Come up with whatever syntax changes we want; it's our CSS now
Ditch stylesheets altogether; do everything in data attributes. Goodbye, separation of concerns. Why has this become so popular?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It seems logical that if you're going to say the future the the web is not being constrained to the current set of tags that you'd also not be limited to the current set of CSS properties. What is the downside of mixing standard with custom, say with a vendor prefix -gl-skybox: url(...) etc?
We are at a fork in the road with CSS. Unless browsers are going to support custom CSS properties, or Web Components pioneers it (doesn't look like they care), we should not be in the business of mixing standard CSS with our flavor of CSS.
Options (not necessarily mutually exclusive):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: