Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Version 1.28.0 not working. #434

Open
folleymcklaukyn opened this issue Mar 27, 2023 · 7 comments
Open

Version 1.28.0 not working. #434

folleymcklaukyn opened this issue Mar 27, 2023 · 7 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@folleymcklaukyn
Copy link

Describe the bug
After update to version 1.28.0 and restart I received an IDE internal error with the stacktrace below:

java.lang.LinkageError: loader constraint violation: when resolving method 'org.slf4j.ILoggerFactory org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder.getLoggerFactory()' the class loader com.intellij.ide.plugins.cl.PluginClassLoader @401378b2 of the current class, org/slf4j/LoggerFactory, and the class loader com.intellij.util.lang.PathClassLoader @3930015a for the method's defining class, org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder, have different Class objects for the type org/slf4j/ILoggerFactory used in the signature (org.slf4j.LoggerFactory is in unnamed module of loader com.intellij.ide.plugins.cl.PluginClassLoader @401378b2, parent loader 'bootstrap'; org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder is in unnamed module of loader com.intellij.util.lang.PathClassLoader @3930015a)
	at org.slf4j.LoggerFactory.getILoggerFactory(LoggerFactory.java:423)
	at org.slf4j.LoggerFactory.getLogger(LoggerFactory.java:362)
	at io.ktor.util.logging.KtorSimpleLoggerJvmKt.KtorSimpleLogger(KtorSimpleLoggerJvm.kt:10)
	at io.ktor.client.plugins.DefaultRequestKt.<clinit>(DefaultRequest.kt:13)
	at security.packaging.PypiChecker$load$client$1.invoke(PypiChecker.kt:49)
	at security.packaging.PypiChecker$load$client$1.invoke(PypiChecker.kt:42)
	at io.ktor.client.HttpClientKt.HttpClient(HttpClient.kt:41)
	at security.packaging.PypiChecker.load(PypiChecker.kt:42)
	at security.packaging.PypiChecker.getMatches(PypiChecker.kt:79)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan$collectPackages$tasks$1$1$1.invokeSuspend(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:59)
	at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith(ContinuationImpl.kt:33)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run(DispatchedTask.kt:106)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.EventLoopImplBase.processNextEvent(EventLoop.common.kt:284)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BlockingCoroutine.joinBlocking(Builders.kt:85)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt__BuildersKt.runBlocking(Builders.kt:59)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt.runBlocking(Unknown Source)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt__BuildersKt.runBlocking$default(Builders.kt:38)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt.runBlocking$default(Unknown Source)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan.collectPackages(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:56)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan.access$collectPackages(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:18)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan$inspectLocalPackages$1.invokeSuspend(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:75)
	at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith(ContinuationImpl.kt:33)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run(DispatchedTask.kt:106)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.EventLoopImplBase.processNextEvent(EventLoop.common.kt:284)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BlockingCoroutine.joinBlocking(Builders.kt:85)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt__BuildersKt.runBlocking(Builders.kt:59)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt.runBlocking(Unknown Source)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt__BuildersKt.runBlocking$default(Builders.kt:38)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt.runBlocking$default(Unknown Source)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan.inspectLocalPackages(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:74)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan.checkPackagesInSdks(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:48)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan.checkPackages(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:34)
	at security.packaging.PythonPackageVulnerabilityStartupTask$runActivity$1.run(PythonPackageVulnerabilityStartupTask.kt:16)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.startTask(CoreProgressManager.java:429)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.ProgressManagerImpl.startTask(ProgressManagerImpl.java:114)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.lambda$runProcessWithProgressAsynchronously$6(CoreProgressManager.java:480)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.ProgressRunner.lambda$submit$3(ProgressRunner.java:252)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.lambda$runProcess$2(CoreProgressManager.java:186)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.lambda$executeProcessUnderProgress$13(CoreProgressManager.java:604)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.registerIndicatorAndRun(CoreProgressManager.java:679)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.computeUnderProgress(CoreProgressManager.java:635)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.executeProcessUnderProgress(CoreProgressManager.java:603)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.ProgressManagerImpl.executeProcessUnderProgress(ProgressManagerImpl.java:60)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.runProcess(CoreProgressManager.java:173)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.ProgressRunner.lambda$submit$4(ProgressRunner.java:252)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$AsyncSupply.run(CompletableFuture.java:1768)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1136)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$PrivilegedThreadFactory$1$1.run(Executors.java:702)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$PrivilegedThreadFactory$1$1.run(Executors.java:699)
	at java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:399)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$PrivilegedThreadFactory$1.run(Executors.java:699)
	at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)

induced.txt has the following stacktrace:

Following exceptions happened soon after this one, most probably they are induced.


2023-03-27T14:53:33.756
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class io.ktor.client.plugins.DefaultRequestKt
	at security.packaging.PypiChecker$load$client$1.invoke(PypiChecker.kt:49)
	at security.packaging.PypiChecker$load$client$1.invoke(PypiChecker.kt:42)
	at io.ktor.client.HttpClientKt.HttpClient(HttpClient.kt:41)
	at security.packaging.PypiChecker.load(PypiChecker.kt:42)
	at security.packaging.PypiChecker.getMatches(PypiChecker.kt:79)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan$collectPackages$tasks$1$1$1.invokeSuspend(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:59)
	at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith(ContinuationImpl.kt:33)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run(DispatchedTask.kt:106)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.EventLoopImplBase.processNextEvent(EventLoop.common.kt:284)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BlockingCoroutine.joinBlocking(Builders.kt:85)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt__BuildersKt.runBlocking(Builders.kt:59)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt.runBlocking(Unknown Source)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt__BuildersKt.runBlocking$default(Builders.kt:38)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt.runBlocking$default(Unknown Source)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan.collectPackages(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:56)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan.access$collectPackages(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:18)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan$inspectLocalPackages$1.invokeSuspend(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:75)
	at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith(ContinuationImpl.kt:33)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run(DispatchedTask.kt:106)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.EventLoopImplBase.processNextEvent(EventLoop.common.kt:284)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BlockingCoroutine.joinBlocking(Builders.kt:85)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt__BuildersKt.runBlocking(Builders.kt:59)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt.runBlocking(Unknown Source)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt__BuildersKt.runBlocking$default(Builders.kt:38)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt.runBlocking$default(Unknown Source)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan.inspectLocalPackages(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:74)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan.checkPackagesInSdks(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:48)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan.checkPackages(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:34)
	at security.packaging.PythonPackageVulnerabilityStartupTask$runActivity$1.run(PythonPackageVulnerabilityStartupTask.kt:16)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.startTask(CoreProgressManager.java:429)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.ProgressManagerImpl.startTask(ProgressManagerImpl.java:114)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.lambda$runProcessWithProgressAsynchronously$6(CoreProgressManager.java:480)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.ProgressRunner.lambda$submit$3(ProgressRunner.java:252)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.lambda$runProcess$2(CoreProgressManager.java:186)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.lambda$executeProcessUnderProgress$13(CoreProgressManager.java:604)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.registerIndicatorAndRun(CoreProgressManager.java:679)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.computeUnderProgress(CoreProgressManager.java:635)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.executeProcessUnderProgress(CoreProgressManager.java:603)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.ProgressManagerImpl.executeProcessUnderProgress(ProgressManagerImpl.java:60)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.runProcess(CoreProgressManager.java:173)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.ProgressRunner.lambda$submit$4(ProgressRunner.java:252)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$AsyncSupply.run(CompletableFuture.java:1768)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1136)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$PrivilegedThreadFactory$1$1.run(Executors.java:702)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$PrivilegedThreadFactory$1$1.run(Executors.java:699)
	at java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:399)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$PrivilegedThreadFactory$1.run(Executors.java:699)
	at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)

To Reproduce
Code or Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Update the plugin from 1.27.0 to 1.28.0
  2. Restart pycharm ide
  3. It will open a IDE internal error window with the stack trace.

Expected behavior
Install the plugin, restart the IDE without any popup error.

Screenshots
Screenshots of the error:
Captura de Tela 2023-03-27 às 15 18 39
Captura de Tela 2023-03-27 às 15 18 47

Additional context

  • Plugin Version - 1.28.0
  • PyCharm Version (or IDE version) - PyCharm 2022.3.3 (Professional Edition) Build #PY-223.8836.43, built on March 10, 2023
  • Python Version - 3.10.10
@folleymcklaukyn folleymcklaukyn added the bug Something isn't working label Mar 27, 2023
@folleymcklaukyn
Copy link
Author

A new information. I cannot rollback to 1.27.0 version.
After uninstall the last version, install 1.27.0 and restart the IDE, I got another popup error with the following stacktrace:

java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke "com.intellij.notification.NotificationGroup.createNotification(String, String, com.intellij.notification.NotificationType)" because "security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan.NOTIFICATION_GROUP" is null
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan.showFoundIssueWarning(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:122)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan.access$showFoundIssueWarning(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:18)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan$inspectLocalPackages$1.invokeSuspend(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:77)
	at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith(ContinuationImpl.kt:33)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run(DispatchedTask.kt:106)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.EventLoopImplBase.processNextEvent(EventLoop.common.kt:284)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BlockingCoroutine.joinBlocking(Builders.kt:85)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt__BuildersKt.runBlocking(Builders.kt:59)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt.runBlocking(Unknown Source)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt__BuildersKt.runBlocking$default(Builders.kt:38)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt.runBlocking$default(Unknown Source)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan.inspectLocalPackages(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:74)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan.checkPackagesInSdks(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:48)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan.checkPackages(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:34)
	at security.packaging.PythonPackageVulnerabilityStartupTask$runActivity$1.run(PythonPackageVulnerabilityStartupTask.kt:16)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.startTask(CoreProgressManager.java:429)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.ProgressManagerImpl.startTask(ProgressManagerImpl.java:114)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.lambda$runProcessWithProgressAsynchronously$6(CoreProgressManager.java:480)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.ProgressRunner.lambda$submit$3(ProgressRunner.java:252)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.lambda$runProcess$2(CoreProgressManager.java:186)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.lambda$executeProcessUnderProgress$13(CoreProgressManager.java:604)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.registerIndicatorAndRun(CoreProgressManager.java:679)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.computeUnderProgress(CoreProgressManager.java:635)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.executeProcessUnderProgress(CoreProgressManager.java:603)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.ProgressManagerImpl.executeProcessUnderProgress(ProgressManagerImpl.java:60)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.runProcess(CoreProgressManager.java:173)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.ProgressRunner.lambda$submit$4(ProgressRunner.java:252)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$AsyncSupply.run(CompletableFuture.java:1768)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1136)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$PrivilegedThreadFactory$1$1.run(Executors.java:702)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$PrivilegedThreadFactory$1$1.run(Executors.java:699)
	at java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:399)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$PrivilegedThreadFactory$1.run(Executors.java:699)
	at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)

@quantumpacket
Copy link

I've been getting the same issue for a long time. It's particularly annoying because the error icon in the IDE blinks red and when I check it's always this same error and it happens continually throughout the coding session. Do note that the plugin is still working as intended, just this exception needs to be addressed.

@tonybaloney could we please get a fix for this? :)

@tonybaloney
Copy link
Owner

Have you got access to the latest PyCharm version? This error means the version of the logging module used is not compatible with the one in the JDK, which is specific to the PyCharm version.

The PyCharm plugin APIs change frequently, so I can't continue to maintain backward compatibility between releases

@quantumpacket
Copy link

quantumpacket commented Jul 21, 2023

I'm using the following according to the About menu. The PyCharm version is the latest.

PyCharm 2023.1.4 (Professional Edition)
Build #PY-231.9225.15, built on July 11, 2023
Runtime version: 17.0.7+10-b829.16 amd64
VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM by JetBrains s.r.o.

@tonybaloney
Copy link
Owner

I'm using the following according to the About menu. The PyCharm version is the latest.

PyCharm 2023.1.4 (Professional Edition)

Build #PY-231.9225.15, built on July 11, 2023

Runtime version: 17.0.7+10-b829.16 amd64

VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM by JetBrains s.r.o.

Thanks. The error you’re reporting is unrelated to the one in the OP comment. I’m looking into it

@quantumpacket
Copy link

Thanks. The error you’re reporting is unrelated to the one in the OP comment. I’m looking into it

Oh, they appeared to be the same at first glance. Here is my stacktrace if it helps.

java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class io.ktor.client.plugins.DefaultRequestKt
	at security.packaging.PypiChecker$load$client$1.invoke(PypiChecker.kt:49)
	at security.packaging.PypiChecker$load$client$1.invoke(PypiChecker.kt:42)
	at io.ktor.client.HttpClientKt.HttpClient(HttpClient.kt:41)
	at security.packaging.PypiChecker.load(PypiChecker.kt:42)
	at security.packaging.PypiChecker.getMatches(PypiChecker.kt:79)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan$collectPackages$tasks$1$1$1.invokeSuspend(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:59)
	at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith(ContinuationImpl.kt:33)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run(DispatchedTask.kt:106)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.EventLoopImplBase.processNextEvent(EventLoop.common.kt:284)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BlockingCoroutine.joinBlocking(Builders.kt:85)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt__BuildersKt.runBlocking(Builders.kt:59)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt.runBlocking(Unknown Source)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt__BuildersKt.runBlocking$default(Builders.kt:38)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt.runBlocking$default(Unknown Source)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan.collectPackages(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:56)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan.access$collectPackages(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:18)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan$inspectLocalPackages$1.invokeSuspend(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:75)
	at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith(ContinuationImpl.kt:33)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run(DispatchedTask.kt:106)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.EventLoopImplBase.processNextEvent(EventLoop.common.kt:284)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BlockingCoroutine.joinBlocking(Builders.kt:85)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt__BuildersKt.runBlocking(Builders.kt:59)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt.runBlocking(Unknown Source)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt__BuildersKt.runBlocking$default(Builders.kt:38)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt.runBlocking$default(Unknown Source)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan.inspectLocalPackages(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:74)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan.checkPackagesInSdks(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:48)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan.checkPackages(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:34)
	at security.packaging.PythonPackageVulnerabilityStartupTask$runActivity$1.run(PythonPackageVulnerabilityStartupTask.kt:16)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.startTask(CoreProgressManager.java:429)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.ProgressManagerImpl.startTask(ProgressManagerImpl.java:114)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.lambda$runProcessWithProgressAsynchronously$6(CoreProgressManager.java:480)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.ProgressRunner.lambda$submit$3(ProgressRunner.java:252)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.lambda$runProcess$2(CoreProgressManager.java:186)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.lambda$executeProcessUnderProgress$13(CoreProgressManager.java:604)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.registerIndicatorAndRun(CoreProgressManager.java:679)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.computeUnderProgress(CoreProgressManager.java:635)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.executeProcessUnderProgress(CoreProgressManager.java:603)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.ProgressManagerImpl.executeProcessUnderProgress(ProgressManagerImpl.java:60)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.runProcess(CoreProgressManager.java:173)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.ProgressRunner.lambda$submit$4(ProgressRunner.java:252)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$AsyncSupply.run(CompletableFuture.java:1768)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1136)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$PrivilegedThreadFactory$1$1.run(Executors.java:702)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$PrivilegedThreadFactory$1$1.run(Executors.java:699)
	at java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:399)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$PrivilegedThreadFactory$1.run(Executors.java:699)
	at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
Caused by: java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError: Exception java.lang.LinkageError: loader constraint violation: when resolving method 'org.slf4j.ILoggerFactory org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder.getLoggerFactory()' the class loader com.intellij.ide.plugins.cl.PluginClassLoader @294e3522 of the current class, org/slf4j/LoggerFactory, and the class loader com.intellij.util.lang.PathClassLoader @763d9750 for the method's defining class, org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder, have different Class objects for the type org/slf4j/ILoggerFactory used in the signature (org.slf4j.LoggerFactory is in unnamed module of loader com.intellij.ide.plugins.cl.PluginClassLoader @294e3522, parent loader 'bootstrap'; org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder is in unnamed module of loader com.intellij.util.lang.PathClassLoader @763d9750) [in thread "ApplicationImpl pooled thread 361"]
	at org.slf4j.LoggerFactory.getILoggerFactory(LoggerFactory.java:423)
	at org.slf4j.LoggerFactory.getLogger(LoggerFactory.java:362)
	at io.ktor.util.logging.KtorSimpleLoggerJvmKt.KtorSimpleLogger(KtorSimpleLoggerJvm.kt:10)
	at io.ktor.client.plugins.DefaultRequestKt.<clinit>(DefaultRequest.kt:13)
	... 49 more

@tonybaloney
Copy link
Owner

Thanks. The error you’re reporting is unrelated to the one in the OP comment. I’m looking into it

Oh, they appeared to be the same at first glance. Here is my stacktrace if it helps.

java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class io.ktor.client.plugins.DefaultRequestKt
	at security.packaging.PypiChecker$load$client$1.invoke(PypiChecker.kt:49)
	at security.packaging.PypiChecker$load$client$1.invoke(PypiChecker.kt:42)
	at io.ktor.client.HttpClientKt.HttpClient(HttpClient.kt:41)
	at security.packaging.PypiChecker.load(PypiChecker.kt:42)
	at security.packaging.PypiChecker.getMatches(PypiChecker.kt:79)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan$collectPackages$tasks$1$1$1.invokeSuspend(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:59)
	at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith(ContinuationImpl.kt:33)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run(DispatchedTask.kt:106)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.EventLoopImplBase.processNextEvent(EventLoop.common.kt:284)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BlockingCoroutine.joinBlocking(Builders.kt:85)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt__BuildersKt.runBlocking(Builders.kt:59)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt.runBlocking(Unknown Source)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt__BuildersKt.runBlocking$default(Builders.kt:38)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt.runBlocking$default(Unknown Source)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan.collectPackages(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:56)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan.access$collectPackages(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:18)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan$inspectLocalPackages$1.invokeSuspend(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:75)
	at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith(ContinuationImpl.kt:33)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run(DispatchedTask.kt:106)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.EventLoopImplBase.processNextEvent(EventLoop.common.kt:284)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BlockingCoroutine.joinBlocking(Builders.kt:85)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt__BuildersKt.runBlocking(Builders.kt:59)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt.runBlocking(Unknown Source)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt__BuildersKt.runBlocking$default(Builders.kt:38)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt.runBlocking$default(Unknown Source)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan.inspectLocalPackages(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:74)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan.checkPackagesInSdks(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:48)
	at security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan.checkPackages(PyPackageSecurityScan.kt:34)
	at security.packaging.PythonPackageVulnerabilityStartupTask$runActivity$1.run(PythonPackageVulnerabilityStartupTask.kt:16)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.startTask(CoreProgressManager.java:429)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.ProgressManagerImpl.startTask(ProgressManagerImpl.java:114)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.lambda$runProcessWithProgressAsynchronously$6(CoreProgressManager.java:480)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.ProgressRunner.lambda$submit$3(ProgressRunner.java:252)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.lambda$runProcess$2(CoreProgressManager.java:186)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.lambda$executeProcessUnderProgress$13(CoreProgressManager.java:604)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.registerIndicatorAndRun(CoreProgressManager.java:679)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.computeUnderProgress(CoreProgressManager.java:635)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.executeProcessUnderProgress(CoreProgressManager.java:603)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.ProgressManagerImpl.executeProcessUnderProgress(ProgressManagerImpl.java:60)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.runProcess(CoreProgressManager.java:173)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.ProgressRunner.lambda$submit$4(ProgressRunner.java:252)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$AsyncSupply.run(CompletableFuture.java:1768)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1136)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$PrivilegedThreadFactory$1$1.run(Executors.java:702)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$PrivilegedThreadFactory$1$1.run(Executors.java:699)
	at java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:399)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$PrivilegedThreadFactory$1.run(Executors.java:699)
	at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)
Caused by: java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError: Exception java.lang.LinkageError: loader constraint violation: when resolving method 'org.slf4j.ILoggerFactory org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder.getLoggerFactory()' the class loader com.intellij.ide.plugins.cl.PluginClassLoader @294e3522 of the current class, org/slf4j/LoggerFactory, and the class loader com.intellij.util.lang.PathClassLoader @763d9750 for the method's defining class, org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder, have different Class objects for the type org/slf4j/ILoggerFactory used in the signature (org.slf4j.LoggerFactory is in unnamed module of loader com.intellij.ide.plugins.cl.PluginClassLoader @294e3522, parent loader 'bootstrap'; org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder is in unnamed module of loader com.intellij.util.lang.PathClassLoader @763d9750) [in thread "ApplicationImpl pooled thread 361"]
	at org.slf4j.LoggerFactory.getILoggerFactory(LoggerFactory.java:423)
	at org.slf4j.LoggerFactory.getLogger(LoggerFactory.java:362)
	at io.ktor.util.logging.KtorSimpleLoggerJvmKt.KtorSimpleLogger(KtorSimpleLoggerJvm.kt:10)
	at io.ktor.client.plugins.DefaultRequestKt.<clinit>(DefaultRequest.kt:13)
	... 49 more

Sorry I was getting confused with the other stack trace

java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke "com.intellij.notification.NotificationGroup.createNotification(String, String, com.intellij.notification.NotificationType)" because "security.packaging.PyPackageSecurityScan.NOTIFICATION_GROUP" is null

This one needs a separate fix.

Your trace looks similar in that it's a loader bug and there's a version conflict between the logging module that PyCharm has and the one installed by this plugin as a dependency.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants