Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Syntax Proposals #1

Open
theypsilon opened this issue Nov 24, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Syntax Proposals #1

theypsilon opened this issue Nov 24, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@theypsilon
Copy link
Owner

theypsilon commented Nov 24, 2019

This issue is to discuss changes on the syntax that could or could not happen at the version 1.0.

I'm not particularly happy with the current syntax, and I couldn't come up with something better, so any feedback in this regard would be highly appreciated.

My goals would be the following:

  • Syntax must be greppable. Right now, I can achieve that thanks to the fn and : parts.
  • Syntax must be not too verbose. I have the feeling that the need to use a pair of attributes is verbose on its own, so it would be great if we can reduce the verbosity within these margins.
  • Syntax must be easy to remember, and close to idiomatic.
  • Syntax shouldn't look too magic or confusing.

After all that being said, I don't think syntax is super important. And minor or opinionated changes shouldn't be taken seriously unless the advantages are clearly worth it. If there is no big improvements in this front, syntax will stay the same as it is now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant