Yvgrossmann feedback #349
Yvgrossmann feedback #349
Conversation
|
@ljgarcia What's your idea, do you feel that your paper: https://zenodo.org/records/10374839 makes sense here? From looking over it, It felt more like a report of a productive hackathon, then a collection of current best practice. Also pinging your colleague @yvgrossmann . |
Co-authored-by: Frank Löffler <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Frank Löffler <[email protected]>
competencies.md
Outdated
| Metadata can also be used | ||
| actively during, within, and after a research project, to edify the decision-making |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am not sure I understand the difference between:
- used during a project
- used within a project
Doesn't within imply during, and during imply within, given that we are only talking about the project and not any external system?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
My best guess would be that during refers to the people in the project processing the metadata mentally while within means that the software itself makes use of the metadata. But I agree that it is something that makes one stumble when reading.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I agree it is somewhat redundant. However, I wanted to emphasise that using metadata during the project to help direct the project is a real benefit. Typically, the common view is that metadata is collected for follow on projects or other users of the project. The metadata is then like a tombstone: here lies.... RIP
There was a problem hiding this comment.
True.. But would we need both during and within then?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ah, I missed the last bit, edify the project. I don't like this phrase, it has religious connotations to me. I prefer the original inform the decision making as that's more neutral.
Co-authored-by: Jeremy Cohen <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Magnus Hagdorn <[email protected]>
I did it!