You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently batch reassignment of sample sets is based on ids, but for clarity should be based on names. I had a go at this but with the current implementation it is trickier than anticipated. Basically, the individuals_table needs a new column with the current sample set name which is defined in the sample_sets_table. However, the latter is editable and is updated from time to time with new sample sets, which would need propagation to the individuals_table. Currently, the tables are sort of oblivious to each other's existence.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently batch reassignment of sample sets is based on ids, but for clarity should be based on names. I had a go at this but with the current implementation it is trickier than anticipated. Basically, the individuals_table needs a new column with the current sample set name which is defined in the sample_sets_table. However, the latter is editable and is updated from time to time with new sample sets, which would need propagation to the individuals_table. Currently, the tables are sort of oblivious to each other's existence.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: