You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
HNSW has become the de facto standard for many vector databases. It is often considered:
particularly well-suited for large-scale vector similarity searches due to its multi-layered graph structure, which efficiently navigates vector embeddings, and its support for the incremental addition of new data points.
However, we challenge this assumption. While HNSW performs well on smaller datasets, it struggles to scale effectively when dataset sizes grow significantly. This is largely due to its reliance on memory-based indexing, which becomes impractical for large-scale applications compared to disk-based solutions.
This contrast could serve as the foundation for a blog post, where we illustrate why memory-based approaches like HNSW fall short in scalability and why disk-based solutions offer a more practical alternative for massive datasets.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
HNSW has become the de facto standard for many vector databases. It is often considered:
However, we challenge this assumption. While HNSW performs well on smaller datasets, it struggles to scale effectively when dataset sizes grow significantly. This is largely due to its reliance on memory-based indexing, which becomes impractical for large-scale applications compared to disk-based solutions.
This contrast could serve as the foundation for a blog post, where we illustrate why memory-based approaches like HNSW fall short in scalability and why disk-based solutions offer a more practical alternative for massive datasets.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: