Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

User defined filters for system configurations #1601

Closed
juk opened this issue Oct 17, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

User defined filters for system configurations #1601

juk opened this issue Oct 17, 2022 · 4 comments
Labels
area | hardware Implementation of hardware requirements

Comments

@juk
Copy link
Collaborator

juk commented Oct 17, 2022

That would be helpful to have a feature that allows user to define their own system requirements.
For example, I regularly need to test on system with various HW configurations and would like to define my own configurations and reuse them.

AMD__ROME:
CPU family=23
CPU model=49

MEMORY_MIN_64G
SYSTEM memory >= 64G

NOGSS
SYSTEM name != "%gss%"

@juk juk changed the title User defined filters with system requirements User defined filters for system configurations Oct 17, 2022
@happz happz added the area | hardware Implementation of hardware requirements label Oct 17, 2022
@bmeneg
Copy link

bmeneg commented Oct 2, 2024

Am I right to assume that this requirement has been partially fulfilled with https://tmt.readthedocs.io/en/stable/plugins/provision.html#hardware-requirement-support ?

@happz
Copy link
Collaborator

happz commented Oct 3, 2024

I believe so, yes. This can be closed then.

@happz happz closed this as completed Oct 3, 2024
@bmeneg
Copy link

bmeneg commented Dec 27, 2024

@happz I probably jumped ahead and missed the real meaning of this feature request: the idea is to have a way to set separated names or filters for the provision step, so instead of requiring every single hw requirement on every plan, it would be possible to request the "tag name".

Can we reopen it?

@bmeneg
Copy link

bmeneg commented Jan 6, 2025

I've opened #3447 as follow up.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area | hardware Implementation of hardware requirements
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants