-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TG2-AMENDMENT_SEX_STANDARDIZED #284
Comments
I saw in #286 References: GBIF (2021). Darwin Core Nomenclatural Type Status Vocabulary http://rs.gbif.org/vocabulary/gbif/type_status so should this also be in the References? https://rs.gbif.org/vocabulary/gbif/sex.xml |
Noting that the current GBIF sex vocabulary is very animal centric. |
Thanks @ymgan - added. @chicoreus - agreed |
oh, seems like GBIF is working on the vocabularies for sex at the moment gbif/vocabulary#83 |
@ymgan yes, we are updating vocabularies and moving them from enums to the vocabulary server, eventually. This is also the case for Type Status btw. The updates are to improve the mapping of hidden values provided by publishers. The sex vocabulary is very animal centric since most data comes from eBird @chicoreus - but please, if you know of any sources that cover concepts suitable for other groups, then we should be able to include them. |
I have changed this to Immature/Incomplete pending the Vocabulary by GBIF. |
The vocabulary (v1) is now uploaded to the vocabulary server: https://registry.gbif.org/vocabulary/Sex and can be accessed by the vocabulary API (as Marie mentioned): https://techdocs.gbif.org/en/openapi/v1/vocabulary. |
Grand. I've got an inquiry out with a botanist for sources for richer
terms for some of the very complex botanical concepts around sex, but
she hasn't gotten sources back yet.
|
Similar to what @Tasilee mentioned in #277, #276, seems like GBIF API for Sex vocab is live |
This may not affect your decision but just wanted to highlight that the vocabularies (sex, geodeticdatum, kingdom, month, and taxonrank) are not yet used in interpretation in GBIF. We have to upload a couple more vocabularies before we initiate the process of reinterpretation for all occurrences. |
Updated Source Authority to reflect new GBIF vocabulary. Does this imply this test could be CORE or Supplementary? |
I don't believe that where the vocabulary comes from is a criterion for CORE. It is a separate issue. |
Changed to CORE following updating of GBIF Vocabulary, making a vocabulary available. This was the only reason it was made Immature/Incomplete earlier. |
Note deleted as it referred to Supplementary test which no longer applies |
Changed Source Authority from bdq:sourceAuthority default = "Darwin Core sex" {[https://dwc.tdwg.org/list/#dwc_sex]} {dwc:sex vocabulary API [https://api.gbif.org/v1/vocabularies/Sex/concepts]} to bdq:sourceAuthority default = "GBIF Sex Vocabulary" [https://api.gbif.org/v1/vocabularies/Sex]} {"dwc:sex vocabulary API" [https://api.gbif.org/v1/vocabularies/Sex/concepts]} |
…, added to unit tests. Added implementations for core tests tdwg/bdq#284 tdwg/bdq#275 and tdwg/bdq#276 along with default methods and unit tests.
…and tdwg/bdq#286, need to throw exception on invalid.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: