You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Most of the OT implementations in multi-party-sig/internal/ot/ point to the corresponding spec/paper. For example, in additive.go:
// NewAdditiveOTSender initializes the sender of an Additive OT.//// This follows Protocol 9 of https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/499 to a certain extent.// The main difference is that we strictly conform to the underlying extended OT,// removing Doerner's modifications to the check.
This is very nice! The same is not done for the "base" OT implementation in there multi-party-sig/internal/ot/random.go. The comments don't cite the eprint paper.
What is the paper/spec for random.go? It doesn't seem like it is the "Simplest OT".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Most of the OT implementations in
multi-party-sig/internal/ot/
point to the corresponding spec/paper. For example, inadditive.go
:This is very nice! The same is not done for the "base" OT implementation in there
multi-party-sig/internal/ot/random.go
. The comments don't cite the eprint paper.What is the paper/spec for
random.go
? It doesn't seem like it is the "Simplest OT".The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: