You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@nijave The method of locking atm is too simple to allow multiple concurrent instances of Wyng. This could probably be enhanced to create locks based on the --local path and archive being used, which may allow safe concurrent operation.
However, there would still have to be a global lock for accessing TLVM metadata snapshots, so multiple instances accessing thin LVM would have to take turns when acquiring deltas.
Is it possible to run wyng instances in parallel if they're using different archives and different LVs?
It looks like at least the lockfile path needs changed but not sure if there are limitations with LVM
Given
lv1
lv1-data
lv2
lv2-data
I run 1 wyng instance for no
-data
and 1 wyng instance for-data
sequentially but I'm wondering if it's possible to parallelize these.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: