-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 74
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support m2e 1.1 #53
Comments
Sure - I'm taking a look at the linked MOJO ticket now and making similar changes in m-c-p, however as I don't use eclipse ( and actually, couldn't even figure out how to install m2e the last time I tried ) I'm not sure how I can test this. |
Out of curiosity - what is the desired change here? Are we wanting to attempt to add incremental compilation to c-m-p or just flag all goals in c-m-p as not running on runOnIncremental? |
On 11 August 2012 08:59, Mark Derricutt [email protected] wrote:
Flag all goals ignored would be a good start. Incremental compilation would be awesome though. I don't know much about |
Oops - and in answer to your first post, I can test it for you. That said, it'll be easier for you if you can test locally. I fully accept |
I am seeing this problem in current 1.8.1 (and m2e 1.6.2) as well. |
I've never written anything for m2e, and I don't use Eclipse. So no - no change was done for this. Was that ticket moved over to mojohaus tho ( the new home of (most) of those plugins ). c-m-p is basically in quiet maintenance mode, there is a release I was meaning to make the other day, I've just finished rebasing an old PR that never got applied, but have been sidetracked with work to release it - hopefully this weekend. |
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1785
When using m-clojure-p in Eclipse with m2e you get a "Plugin execution not covered..." message from m2e. This is because it doesn't know whether to run these goals during incremental compilation or not. To enable this m2e needs a little help. I submitted a little patch to the m-less-p which you can see at the link above. They had to do some extra work but the patch has now been integrated.
Please would you consider doing this for m-clojure-p? I hope m-less-p will serve as a useful reference.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: