You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 3, 2024. It is now read-only.
Currently we have the blake2b circuit tested only as part of the super circuit integrated tests, where the output is expected to match an entry of the lookup table
If the blake circuit computes the value incorrectly, it means the super circuit will fail as no entry will exist for the lookup table
However, testing the super circuit is very expensive, and it is desirable to have a unit/dedicated test to assert the correctness of the blake2b circuit
One option is to create a test circuit that will accept a witness value that is the output of a hash, call the circuit, and expect it to exist on the lookup table.
Currently we have the blake2b circuit tested only as part of the super circuit integrated tests, where the output is expected to match an entry of the lookup table
If the blake circuit computes the value incorrectly, it means the super circuit will fail as no entry will exist for the lookup table
However, testing the super circuit is very expensive, and it is desirable to have a unit/dedicated test to assert the correctness of the blake2b circuit
One option is to create a test circuit that will accept a witness value that is the output of a hash, call the circuit, and expect it to exist on the lookup table.
Originally posted by @vlopes11 in #56 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: