Maintainers

[ghost]

This library appears to be stale at the minute - would @syrusakbary be interested in adding further maintainers, to work on the open PRs and issues?

[paulmelnikow]

I make use of this library and I'd be interested in helping!

[versae]

I'd be great to see some of those PRs being merged at some point.

[gustavopp93]

i'd like to help too :)

[chenliu0831]

We are using this as well. Happy to help.

I make use of this library and I'd be interested in helping!

Hi Paul!

[paulmelnikow]

Hi Paul!

😁 Hi Peter! 👋

[paulmelnikow]

I wrote Syrus on May 4. He wrote back a few hours later and I responded, but I haven't heard anything since then. I'll follow up and see what he says!

[syrusakbary]

Happy to add maintainers!

Thanks @paulmelnikow for reaching me personally. I just added you to the repo :)

[paulmelnikow]

I noticed there are some alternate projects mentioned in #115. I hadn't noticed those before and at some point may investigate to see if one of those is farther along.

Meanwhile, I'm happy to try to review and merge PRs. I merged the most popular unanswered PR #66 and left comments on a few more. I suggest we get a beta release out within a few days with the changes from #66, to get our release pipeline flowing. In short order we should also merge #112 or something similar.

We should get the version number out of 0.x territory. Maybe we publish the next release as 1.0.0b0, and once we've merged #112, are confident in the beta, and have made all the breaking changes we want to make, in the short term, release it as 1.0.0?

[paulmelnikow]

@davidshepherd7 has done a bunch of amazing work maintaining this library, both in his fork, and in carefully maintained PRs in made to this repo. (See #116 #112 #113.) @syrusakbary could you add him to this project too?

[paulmelnikow]

@davidshepherd7 has been added and I now have publish access. Thanks @syrusakbary!