Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clearly identify team members #4

Closed
zzcgujl opened this issue Aug 1, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Clearly identify team members #4

zzcgujl opened this issue Aug 1, 2016 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@zzcgujl
Copy link

zzcgujl commented Aug 1, 2016

Idtentify who the research active team members are and what software development they are contributing plus what they need to get out of it in what time frame along with ideintifying who the research inactive team members and what they are contributing plus what they need to get out of it in what time frame.
1, Make it clear to research active members that you respect their research confidentiality and make an agreement about what is sensitive to their research and what is not. Make any agreements about when, if and how long data and software needs to be kept confidential.
2, Make agreements about when and how software changes will be integrated. You may want to fork off some researchers (particualrly inexperienced ones or ones who are making dramatic changes to the codes, perhaps parallelising it, so that they can learn on their fork) and integrate their work comes later.
3, Once you understand the context of those developing and using the code you can develop a plan.

@gvwilson gvwilson self-assigned this Aug 3, 2016
@gvwilson gvwilson changed the title Research active team members and research inactive team members Clearly identify team members Aug 5, 2016
@gvwilson
Copy link
Contributor

gvwilson commented Aug 5, 2016

As per #3, this pushes the lesson toward "building digital scientific instruments" rather than exploratory coding - which is OK, we just need to make it explicit.

@gvwilson
Copy link
Contributor

Closed by 8a41884

gvwilson added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 23, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants