Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add unstructured mesh capability for R2S workflow #3

Closed
gonuke opened this issue Sep 10, 2012 · 4 comments
Closed

Add unstructured mesh capability for R2S workflow #3

gonuke opened this issue Sep 10, 2012 · 4 comments

Comments

@gonuke
Copy link
Member

gonuke commented Sep 10, 2012

Modify R2S workflow for unstructured mesh capability. This will greatly simplify the material definition part of the workflow, at the expense of requiring every region to be meshed with a tet-mesh.

@erelson
Copy link
Contributor

erelson commented Feb 18, 2013

Attempting to list the various details that need to be taken care of for this. Some of these will be their own issues.

mmGridGen/mmgrid.py #38

  • Ray tracing of tet mesh for material fractions
  • Use voxel center point material

ALARA

Additions to source.F90 to read MOAB mesh directly:

Compiling DAGMCNP with iMesh API calls in Fortran #44

  • Understand/implement changes to Makefile; work in progress for distribution
    • gfortran call definitely requires adding -fcray-pointer -I/filespace/groups/cnerg/opt/MOAB/opt-cubit-c12/include -liMesh -L/filespace/groups/cnerg/opt/MOAB/opt-nocgm/lib
    • may also require -lstdc++ -lMOAB -lhdf5 -lnetcdf
    • I need to better understand how current DAGMC functionality uses MOAB (if it does?)

gammas file: #45

  • Decide whether to replace the gammas file completely with the mesh. gammas file is unneeded for unstructured workflow
    • Keeping the file makes it easier to quickly change parameters (e.g. source particle debugging, void rejection options)

@gonuke
Copy link
Member Author

gonuke commented Feb 19, 2013

Admin note: You could make this a milestone and each of the major bullets could be issues attached to that milestone.

@erelson
Copy link
Contributor

erelson commented Feb 19, 2013

Admin reply: That works nicely.

@erelson
Copy link
Contributor

erelson commented Mar 14, 2013

Capability exists. Todo list above has been updated. Related enhancements are now tracked in #50.

@erelson erelson closed this as completed Mar 14, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants