You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 26, 2023. It is now read-only.
What is the estimated speedup of the design as an ASIC, given smaller feature sizes and hence higher clock speeds? Could this possibly be 10x?
Further, I notice that the number of clk/sq for pearson_2 is 4. Is there any design where this is faster? Just curious.
Edit: I see the geriatric's is 1 clk. Amazing. I am guessing this is partly due to using fewer LUTs, but this comes at using BRAM, which slows down the clock?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What is the estimated speedup of the design as an ASIC, given smaller feature sizes and hence higher clock speeds? Could this possibly be 10x?
Further, I notice that the number of clk/sq for pearson_2 is 4. Is there any design where this is faster? Just curious.
Edit: I see the geriatric's is 1 clk. Amazing. I am guessing this is partly due to using fewer LUTs, but this comes at using BRAM, which slows down the clock?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: