Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Flaky Test] should forward delete across blocks #6

Open
github-actions bot opened this issue Jan 23, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

[Flaky Test] should forward delete across blocks #6

github-actions bot opened this issue Jan 23, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@github-actions
Copy link

Flaky test detected. This is an auto-generated issue by GitHub Actions. Please do NOT edit this manually.

Test title

should forward delete across blocks

Test path

specs/editor/various/multi-block-selection.test.js

Errors

[2023-01-23T23:34:16.966Z] Test passed after 1 failed attempt on try/extensible-layout-panel.
  ● Multi-block selection › should forward delete across blocks

    expect(received).toMatchSnapshot()

    Snapshot name: `Multi-block selection should forward delete across blocks 2`

    - Snapshot  - 1
    + Received  + 9

    + <!-- wp:paragraph -->
    + <p>1[</p>
    + <!-- /wp:paragraph -->
    +
    + <!-- wp:paragraph -->
    + <p>.</p>
    + <!-- /wp:paragraph -->
    +
      <!-- wp:heading -->
    - <h2 class="wp-block-heading">1&amp;2</h2>
    + <h2 class="wp-block-heading">]&amp;</h2>
      <!-- /wp:heading -->

      877 |
      878 | 		// Expect a heading with "1&2" as its content.
    > 879 | 		expect( await getEditedPostContent() ).toMatchSnapshot();
          | 		                                       ^
      880 | 	} );
      881 |
      882 | 	it( 'should write over selection', async () => {

      at Object.<anonymous> (specs/editor/various/multi-block-selection.test.js:879:42)
          at runMicrotasks (<anonymous>)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

0 participants