Fix deprecation warnings caused by tests

[DoctorJohn]

Description

This PR fixes all deprecation warnings caused directly by our test code bringing our warning count down from 109 to 53.

Running our tests still results in some deprecation warnings but those are the real ones caused by Strawberry code. I'll look at those in a separate PR so that this PR only changes code in /tests.

Types of Changes

• Core
• Bugfix
• New feature
• Enhancement/optimization
• Documentation

Summary by Sourcery

Fix deprecation warnings in test code by updating deprecated function calls and argument types, and enhance test assertions to check for result data presence.

Bug Fixes:

• Fix deprecation warnings in test code by updating deprecated function calls and argument types.

Tests:

• Update test assertions to check for result data presence and handle deprecation warnings using pytest.deprecated_call.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This PR addresses deprecation warnings in test code by updating type hints, assertions, and function signatures. The main changes involve adding proper type annotations for Info parameters, using DirectiveValue for directive parameters, and updating test assertions to explicitly check for result.data presence.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Added proper type hints for Info parameters in resolver functions	Updated function signatures to include Info type annotation Replaced generic 'info' parameters with properly typed 'strawberry.Info' parameters	tests/litestar/schema.py tests/schema/test_info.py tests/schema/test_arguments.py
Updated directive parameter types to use DirectiveValue	Changed directive value parameters from str to DirectiveValue[str] Updated type hints in directive function definitions	tests/schema/test_directives.py tests/schema/test_extensions.py tests/schema/test_get_extensions.py
Added explicit result.data assertions in tests	Added assert result.data checks before accessing result data Ensures result.data exists before performing assertions on its contents	tests/schema/test_directives.py tests/schema/test_info.py
Updated deprecated test configurations and assertions	Updated pytest.warns to pytest.deprecated_call Added proper deprecation warning message matching Updated test parametrization to handle deprecation contexts	tests/test/test_client.py tests/fields/test_arguments.py

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @DoctorJohn - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟡 Testing: 1 issue found
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 98.73418% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 96.97%. Comparing base (a0573da) to head (4be9c5b).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3727      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.02%   96.97%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         503      503              
  Lines       33666    33702      +36     
  Branches     5618     5627       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits        32664    32683      +19     
- Misses        795      809      +14     
- Partials      207      210       +3     

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #3727 will not alter performance

_{Comparing DoctorJohn:fix-deprecation-warnings-caused-by-tests (4be9c5b) with main (a0573da)}

Summary

✅ 21 untouched benchmarks

[bellini666]

❤️