Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

-geometry position ignored #39

Closed
himdel opened this issue Nov 21, 2014 · 4 comments
Closed

-geometry position ignored #39

himdel opened this issue Nov 21, 2014 · 4 comments

Comments

@himdel
Copy link

himdel commented Nov 21, 2014

When I run rxvt-unicode -geometry 105x55+3+30 with tabbedex, only the 105x55 portion is respected, the position is ignored. Removing tabbedex fixes it. I have no idea why that happens.

(This affects both the stepb version and the mina86 fork.)

@himdel
Copy link
Author

himdel commented Nov 21, 2014

Actually, even the size part is handled wrong:

Running rxvt-unicode -geometry 80x25 and then xwininfo on the window yields 80x25 when tabbedex is off but 79x24 when on. So, an off by one somewhere?

@neilkatin
Copy link

I know this is an ancient bug, but I've been encountering the same bug. I wanted to share that urxvt-tabbed has the same issue with ignoring window position, so it might be an 'upstream' bug that urxvt-tabbedex inherited.

@ernie-cordell
Copy link

Why is this still open? I've tried a lot of things, but nothing works. I know it is my fault, but what am I missing? Posting files and options is useless since it may be anything. I'm on openSUSE Leap 42.3 with a 4.4.138-59-default kernel running an Xfce 4.12 window manager.

@himdel himdel closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Feb 14, 2023
@mina86
Copy link

mina86 commented Feb 14, 2023

Why is this still open?

This repository isn’t maintained. See https://github.com/mina86/urxvt-tabbedex/. Specifically regarding -geometry it got various fixes around that so it may work for you. There’s still mina86#44 open so some issues remain.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants