Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Layer() and possibly Networks() should have an additional .constraints= argument to specify additional constraints. #16

Open
krivit opened this issue Jul 16, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@krivit
Copy link
Member

krivit commented Jul 16, 2022

Whatever is in it would get appended to the formula set on %ergmlhs%.

@vvseva
Copy link

vvseva commented Nov 8, 2022

Hi! Am I getting it correctly that it will be possible to specify layer-aware constraints in future?

@krivit
Copy link
Member Author

krivit commented Nov 8, 2022

It's on the road map, but this not quite what this is about.

@krivit krivit changed the title Layer() and possible Networks() should have an additional .constraints= argument to specify additional constraints. Layer() and possibly Networks() should have an additional .constraints= argument to specify additional constraints. Nov 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants