You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As noticed by Simon, there might be issues with the way we associate our Reactor request support with the Reactor channel vs. Netty channel. This might be the reason some WebClientIntegrationTests are flaky.
After further investigation, this is due to the fact that the Channel is overwritten with a static one after the processing of the request to avoid usage of an outdated pooled connection/channel (see reactor/reactor-netty#3459).
This is a test issue, and we should capture something else than the native request. Perhaps the Attribute or the Channel.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
simonbasle
changed the title
Review ReactorClientHttpRequest channel association
Refactor WebClientIntegrationTest to accommodate ReactorClientHttpRequest channel disassociation
Nov 18, 2024
As noticed by Simon, there might be issues with the way we associate our Reactor request support with the Reactor channel vs. Netty channel. This might be the reason someWebClientIntegrationTests
are flaky.After further investigation, this is due to the fact that the
Channel
is overwritten with a static one after the processing of the request to avoid usage of an outdated pooled connection/channel (see reactor/reactor-netty#3459).This is a test issue, and we should capture something else than the native request. Perhaps the
Attribute
or theChannel
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: