You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Based on the observation that panel membership in the panels document is neither well-maintained or particularly meaningful or required by any process. People do hop-in-and-off the meetings or engaging in repositories or chat channels all the time. Anyone, including the W3C Solid Community Group participants as well as guests can participate by adhering to the Solid Code of Conduct. Guests do not have voting rights - if and when necessary. Membership in the CG is required for voting rights, in addition to agreeing to the CG Contributor License Agreement and the MIT License assigned to a work item or repository when making substantial contributions.
To simplify panel information, the proposal is to omit the panellists - it hasn't been demonstrably useful, and on the contrary it is shown to go stale and possibly misleading. All contributors to the panel can be known based on what's in public, e.g., through github, gitter, publications.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Based on the observation that panel membership in the panels document is neither well-maintained or particularly meaningful or required by any process. People do hop-in-and-off the meetings or engaging in repositories or chat channels all the time. Anyone, including the W3C Solid Community Group participants as well as guests can participate by adhering to the Solid Code of Conduct. Guests do not have voting rights - if and when necessary. Membership in the CG is required for voting rights, in addition to agreeing to the CG Contributor License Agreement and the MIT License assigned to a work item or repository when making substantial contributions.
The essence of the above is reflected in the meeting template and the meeting guideline and announced in meetings when necessary, as well as the Solid process.
To simplify panel information, the proposal is to omit the panellists - it hasn't been demonstrably useful, and on the contrary it is shown to go stale and possibly misleading. All contributors to the panel can be known based on what's in public, e.g., through github, gitter, publications.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: