Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Liaise with RSE leaders on EDIA-focused matters #6

Open
martintoreilly opened this issue Aug 3, 2023 · 13 comments
Open

Liaise with RSE leaders on EDIA-focused matters #6

martintoreilly opened this issue Aug 3, 2023 · 13 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@martintoreilly
Copy link
Collaborator

martintoreilly commented Aug 3, 2023

leaders survey - was shared at RSECon, should have a look to see what results have come in. Would be useful to see what we can help support

@stefpiatek stefpiatek self-assigned this Oct 23, 2023
@twinkarma twinkarma moved this from Todo to In Progress in EDIA Working Group Nov 20, 2023
@twinkarma
Copy link
Collaborator

@twinkarma
Copy link
Collaborator

@mchesterkadwell to post the survey again to the RSE leaders group

  • Thank you for responding to the survey
  • We've had limited response, please help us get a better understanding of EDIA in your institution!

@mchesterkadwell
Copy link
Collaborator

I've posted it to the RSELeaders Slack channel ✅

@twinkarma
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks @mchesterkadwell!

@sjmf
Copy link
Collaborator

sjmf commented Dec 4, 2023

@sjmf to start discussion in the rse-leaders slack channel on whether this being a closed group is gatekeeping people who self-identify as RSE leaders from full participation in the community.

@sjmf
Copy link
Collaborator

sjmf commented Dec 4, 2023

Notes 4/12 – we have now had 7 responses to the RSE Leaders' EDIA survey from engaging through the #rseleaders slack channel. We discussed changing tack and targeting leaders directly via email. TODO:

@stefpiatek
Copy link
Collaborator

Created a List of RSE groups and heads from data in public rse groups and updated with what I could find from the survey responses

@twinkarma
Copy link
Collaborator

Let's wait until next meeting check on this, possibly have another round of chasing up the RSE heads.

@stefpiatek stefpiatek assigned twinkarma and unassigned stefpiatek Apr 11, 2024
@stefpiatek
Copy link
Collaborator

@twinkarma very kindly offered to have a look at the survey to summarise responses and bring back for discussion

@twinkarma
Copy link
Collaborator

twinkarma commented Apr 25, 2024

How do you feel about the diversity of your team(s)?

  • 10/21 groups are ok or better !
  • Male dominated, 7/21 explicitly mentions lack of gender diversity
  • A group noticed a difference in gender roles:
    • UI/UX and project management team is mostly female
    • Dev and sysadmin is mostly male
  • In the future it might be good to split questions for each type of diversity: gender, LGBTQ+, educational background, ethnicity etc.

How is this spread across seniority?

  • 3/21 groups are ok or better:
    • One team has more woman than Men
    • One team where everyone is the same grade
  • Similarly male dominated environment
  • Ethnic minorities are more at non-senior level
  • A few responded with their team structure rather than the diversity, possible need to clarify the question

What steps are you taking to improve EDIA within and across your team(s)?

3 Groups mentioned being actively involved in a scheme:

  • 10000 Black interns scheme
  • EDI Working group
  • Internship program

15 Groups mentioned recruitment

  • EDIA Vetting through the university
  • Writing inclusive job advertisements
  • Advertising jobs through specific groups, e.g. women in HPC, R-Ladies, etc.

Ensure female members in the interview panels

What have you found to be effective in improving EDIA in your team(s)

  • Choosing candidates with complimentary skillset to the team rather than the best skillsets
  • Not sure, as the group is small, recruitment opportunities are limited in small teams
    • Small numbers of female applicants
  • Effective approaches
    • Changing of job spec (no details given)
    • Word of mouth recommendation
    • Internships found to be effective
    • Advertising in a diverse domain

What have you found to be ineffectual in improving EDIA in your team(s)?

  • A few groups not sure because of the small sample size
  • EDIA Statement in job adverts, or just saying that they want to be diverse

How do you feel about the diversity of those involved in your hiring process?

5 groups were ok or happy with hiring diversity

  • Having head of dept/group be woman helps with the interview panel
  • Existing team composition helps, lower diversity team has a harder time putting together a balanced panel

What do you feel could be improved about the diversity of those involved in your hiring process?

  • Most raised similar issues as the last two questions
  • Having non-RSE (e.g. reserachers) on interview panels
  • Requesting HR to create more diverse panels and advertise more widely

What support if any could the RSE Society provide?

  • Promotion of RSE jobs page
  • Provide channels for advertising to underrepresented groups
  • Help review job adverts and give advice on EDIA aspects
  • Linked in presence? Expensive to list jobs for small groups
  • 6x Provide information about best practices, what's been effective, what's not
    • Where to advertise jobs
    • How to form diverse panels panels
    • Guidance on interviews and mock interviews
    • etc.

Is there anything else you would like to share?

  • I am a dinosaur and my early engineering career was male dominated (1-5% women). i was pleasantly surprised to find this university department has a good number of women in senior positions. and in general closer to national gender demographic (but still fewer women than that)
  • It can be difficult to make assessments at the scale of an individual RSE team - trying to gauge what has or hasn't been effective with a small number of examples is difficult, giving the confounding element of chance. Gathering information about best practice, sector diversity as a whole, and other information specifically within RSE would be very helpful in guiding practice and benchmarking.
  • Women still don't apply to my posts in general and it makes me sad.
  • Currently as a team of 1 central RSE, 2 embedded RSEs and 2 RIEs it has been difficult to answer these questions with as much detail as I would like to be able to apply to an important knowledge gathering exercise. Also, given the quantity of available RSE roles across the country, often you end up with a cross section of locality, interest in the institution itself and right time and place for applicants for any individual role, which might skew the diversity in any individual hiring process. I would be interested to see more documentation about how to appeal to a wider audience and make the hiring process more accesible for applicants for if we get to a stage where we are able to expand the team.

@stefpiatek
Copy link
Collaborator

stefpiatek commented Apr 25, 2024

Suggested next steps

  • Worth having a chat with some HR professionals for what we advise
  • Talk with some of the groups like women in HPC, to combine with their existing work and document it
  • Send out summary to RSE leaders and thank them
  • Publish list of resources online and advice
  • Look at if women RSEs have a higher turnover, and why. Longitudinal across teams on exit interviews. Where do people leave to.
  • RSECon
    • experience of being hired - people sharing their stories, what would you like hiring managers to know. BoF session or join in with practical EDIA
    • practical EDIA session

@stefpiatek stefpiatek assigned stefpiatek and unassigned twinkarma Apr 25, 2024
@stefpiatek
Copy link
Collaborator

@mchesterkadwell
Copy link
Collaborator

mchesterkadwell commented Oct 11, 2024

Take the summary points and run past RSE Leaders before taking any action on something that is relatively old. @mchesterkadwell

DONE 21 Oct, deadline of 1 Nov 2024

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants