Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TT-1992] use CTF/lib that supports Docker running go-ethereum v1.15.0 #16477

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Feb 26, 2025

Conversation

Tofel
Copy link
Contributor

@Tofel Tofel commented Feb 19, 2025

... and which uses go-ethereum v1.15.0 in its go.mods, so that it's aligned with the version used by chainlink

@Tofel Tofel requested review from a team as code owners February 19, 2025 15:15
@Tofel Tofel requested a review from vyzaldysanchez February 19, 2025 15:15
@Tofel Tofel changed the title [TT-1992] use CTF/lib that supports Docker running go-ethereum v1.15.0 [DO NOT REVIEW] [TT-1992] use CTF/lib that supports Docker running go-ethereum v1.15.0 Feb 24, 2025
@Tofel Tofel requested a review from a team as a code owner February 24, 2025 11:13
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 24, 2025

AER Report: CI Core ran successfully ✅

aer_workflow , commit

AER Report: Operator UI CI ran successfully ✅

aer_workflow , commit

kalverra
kalverra previously approved these changes Feb 26, 2025
@Tofel Tofel force-pushed the tt-1992-geth-v1.15.0-docker branch from 66f0256 to ddd4130 Compare February 26, 2025 16:38
@cl-sonarqube-production
Copy link

@kalverra kalverra enabled auto-merge February 26, 2025 19:24
@kalverra kalverra added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 26, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Feb 26, 2025
@kalverra kalverra added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 26, 2025
Merged via the queue into develop with commit d27cae5 Feb 26, 2025
187 of 188 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants