You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
To make these take-home assignments as fair as possible, this is the rubric to be used for grading them. Copy-paste it into a writeable destination and fill it out for each candidate with a score ranging from N/A to 5, where 0 is worst and 5 is best.
Task completion
Metric
Grade
All artifacts were provided
Documentation for the result is provided
Artifacts are functional and complete
Code quality
Metric
Grade
Code is in a version control system
Code is readable and neat
Formatting is consistent and appropriate to the programming language used
Commit history is complete, easy to follow
Comments are appropriately used to describe complex code
Communication and professionalism
Metric
Grade
Questions, if any, were asked in a timely manner
Communication was polite and professional
Documentation for the artifact is complete
Documentation is well-written and professional
Bonus points
Metric
Grade
Git commits are signed
Individual assignment bonus tasks were completed (one score point for each task completed)
[1]: Anything exceptional about the submission: an error found in the assignment, a suggestion for rewording. Anything that stands out to show the candidate goes an extra mile.