Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing and incompatible licensing #25

Open
comradekingu opened this issue Feb 12, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Missing and incompatible licensing #25

comradekingu opened this issue Feb 12, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@comradekingu
Copy link

comradekingu commented Feb 12, 2023

@epoberezkin
https://hosted.weblate.org/projects/simplex-chat/website/#information
used to say
AGPLv1-or-later, whereas now it says AGPLv3-only

Those aren't compatible, and neither is compatible with what is effectively a proprietary
source repo. There should be a license file in the form of "LICENSE" or "COPYING".

As for licensing, all AGPLv3-or-later works.
That needs everyone in https://github.com/simplex-chat/website/graphs/contributors to agree.

Adding some insult to injury, the Weblate repo now has a CLA
https://hosted.weblate.org/contributor-agreement/simplex-chat/website/?next=/projects/simplex-chat/website/

If you add "kingu" as an admin on Weblate I can look for other things to fix :)

@epoberezkin
Copy link
Member

epoberezkin commented Feb 17, 2023

@comradekingu sorry for the confusion, I've chosen the same license that we have in the app - I don't think AGPL has a later version than v3, so why it should be "AGPL v3 or later"?

Those aren't compatible, and neither is compatible with what is effectively a proprietary
source repo. There should be a license file in the form of "LICENSE" or "COPYING".

We do have license in the repo here: https://github.com/simplex-chat/simplex-chat/blob/stable/LICENSE

Maybe I misunderstand...

Adding some insult to injury, the Weblate repo now has a CLA

I think all open-source projects absolutely must have some simple CLA, as otherwise we would have an IP that is difficult to finance, hand over to any non-profit or put in public domain. SQLLite position because of that is to not accept any contribution and re-implement any suggestions internally, which I think is taking it a bit too far, but I don't see any problem with it - I accepted quite a few of them. Happy to amend if some terms seem erroneous – please let me know.

@epoberezkin
Copy link
Member

btw this repo is deprecated - we should archive it - and website source is now in simplex-chat repo...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants