You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If using the foo_individual[namespace.relation ] = bar_individual form, overrides any other relation made with any subclass of namespace.relation.
example, if we refer to city, define and add a Major, then add a neighbourhood part, the relation to major (has major is subclass of has part) is gone. One needs to remember to use the += form, even though logically adding elements at a different level should be independent.
proposal: make the [ ] notation act the same as the one using connect, or discourage using it, or issue clear note in the documentation.
If using the
foo_individual[namespace.relation ] = bar_individual
form, overrides any other relation made with any subclass of namespace.relation.example, if we refer to city, define and add a Major, then add a neighbourhood part, the relation to major (has major is subclass of has part) is gone. One needs to remember to use the
+=
form, even though logically adding elements at a different level should be independent.proposal: make the [ ] notation act the same as the one using connect, or discourage using it, or issue clear note in the documentation.
@yoavnash @pablo-de-andres do you know anything about this so far?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: