-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Data source parser/reader #620
Comments
Do we just want to extract data? Because then I would not use a wrapper, since both simulations and data storage can be used for communication in both directions which I think is part of what makes wrappers wrappers |
Good point. It can still be beneficial though to have a "read-only" wrapper, for direct access to data in an OSP-core script. |
I think would define another component at the same level as wrappers. A parser/reader, if you will. |
That sounds indeed better. Great suggestion. |
It might make for a nice symmetric design if we think of readers, writers and wrappers |
Definitely agree. In case of the GMSHWrapper, I followed a separation between According to my experience with this module from the FORCE-project, if there is a syntactic third-party-tool already available, the |
Could be related to mapping data from tables to RDF. Related technologies: |
I am labelling this also as breaking change as we might want to introduce a new API or do changes to the wrapper API for this. |
Related #651. |
So far we had wrappers for simulations and for data sink (to store data). We still don't have a wrapper for extracting data from an existing data repo. Such a wrapper would be beneficial for demos and various applications.
Suggestions:
Could be related to #267 and #290
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: