You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello @shivangi-aneja, I have a question about the perturbation loss used for the single VS multiple manipulation methods.
In eq.14, you try to minimize $||\delta_i^{all}||_2$ but in eq.6, you try to minimize $||X_i^p-X_i||_2 + ||X_i^{Gp}-X_i||_2$. I understand that both formula are approximately the same since we approximately have $$||X_i^p-X_i||_2=||Clamp_{\epsilon}(X_i+\delta_i)-X_i||_2\approx||\delta_i||_2$$
If my above supposition is correct, why would you use $||\delta_i^{all}||_2$ in eq.14 instead of $||X_i^{all}-X_i||_2$ ?
I suppose that this is not a really important question since there wouldn't be much difference in the result, but still I'd want to know if there is a particular reason for doing that.
In any cases, thank you for this great work. I've learned a lot thanks to your paper.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello @shivangi-aneja, I have a question about the perturbation loss used for the single VS multiple manipulation methods.
In eq.14, you try to minimize$||\delta_i^{all}||_2$ but in eq.6, you try to minimize $||X_i^p-X_i||_2 + ||X_i^{Gp}-X_i||_2$ . I understand that both formula are approximately the same since we approximately have $$||X_i^p-X_i||_2=||Clamp_{\epsilon}(X_i+\delta_i)-X_i||_2\approx||\delta_i||_2$$ $||\delta_i^{all}||_2$ in eq.14 instead of $||X_i^{all}-X_i||_2$ ?
If my above supposition is correct, why would you use
I suppose that this is not a really important question since there wouldn't be much difference in the result, but still I'd want to know if there is a particular reason for doing that.
In any cases, thank you for this great work. I've learned a lot thanks to your paper.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: