Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

wallet.initialize() and adapter.initialize() work inconsistently across wallet implementations #462

Open
mrnerdhair opened this issue Mar 14, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
tech-debt A suboptimality that existed in code when it was written.

Comments

@mrnerdhair
Copy link
Contributor

mrnerdhair commented Mar 14, 2022

The wallet.initialize() and adapter.initialize() functions are typed (and work) inconsistently.

  • Make initialize() on adapters private and remove unnecessary dummy implementations.
  • On adapters with do use initialize(), it should consistently turn a reference to a single device into a wallet instance, and pairDevice() should simply retrieve a reference to the default device and delegating the actual wallet creation to initialize().
  • initialize() on wallets should always return a Promise<boolean>.

Fixed by #431.

@mrnerdhair mrnerdhair added the tech-debt A suboptimality that existed in code when it was written. label Mar 14, 2022
@mrnerdhair mrnerdhair linked a pull request Mar 17, 2022 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
tech-debt A suboptimality that existed in code when it was written.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant