-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use npm workspaces rather than lerna for monorepo dependency managment #671
Comments
You might find it doesn't quite do everything you want, simpler always better if it does. I remember reviewing when it came out a couple years ago |
Lerna now using Nx is faster. Turf is now using a combo of pnpm, lerna, monorepolint to coordinate everything it does for reference. |
Do you know if there's any archived discussion of adopting those tools for turf? My thinking now is to keep things as simple as I can get away with. It would be nice to easily adopt something like Bun in the future. |
There's a little bit of discussion here, I would say the idea was not to do a complete rewrite, just upgrade and replace when necessary - Turfjs/turf#2555. Note turf already was using monorepolint, which had a follow-on PR to work with pnpm - Turfjs/turf#2557. I can't tell you exactly which needs necessitated the addition of each tool. I've been considering what to do with geoprocessing in the new year. |
I'm using a very outdated version of lerna and npm has gained a lot of monorepo management features since this project started. Using lerna causes a lot of problems:
It is time to ditch lerna for a more modern setup.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: