Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

transport: replace atomic.Value with go 1.19 atomic.Pointer where suitable #269

Open
Kulezi opened this issue Aug 9, 2022 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #284
Open

transport: replace atomic.Value with go 1.19 atomic.Pointer where suitable #269

Kulezi opened this issue Aug 9, 2022 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #284
Labels
transport

Comments

@Kulezi
Copy link
Contributor

Kulezi commented Aug 9, 2022

No description provided.

@Kulezi Kulezi changed the title transport: replace atomic.Value with go 1.19 atomic pointer where suitable transport: replace atomic.Value with go 1.19 atomic.Pointer where suitable Aug 9, 2022
Kulezi added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 12, 2022
@Kulezi
transport: replace atomic.Value with atomic.Pointer[T]
5fa174f 
Fixes #269
Kulezi added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 12, 2022
@Kulezi
transport: replace atomic.Value with atomic.Pointer[T]
bd3757b 
Fixes #269
@Kulezi Kulezi linked a pull request Sep 12, 2022 that will close this issue
transport: use go 1.19 atomic.Pointer instead of atomic.Value #284
Open
Kulezi added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 12, 2022
@Kulezi
transport: replace atomic.Value with atomic.Pointer[T]
8cf0d36 
Fixes #269
Kulezi added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 12, 2022
@Kulezi
transport: replace atomic.Value with atomic.Pointer[T]
ebeb752 
Fixes #269
Kulezi added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 12, 2022
@Kulezi
transport: replace atomic.Value with atomic.Pointer[T]
9235bba 
Fixes #269
@Kulezi Kulezi linked a pull request Sep 12, 2022 that will close this issue
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
transport
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

transport: use go 1.19 atomic.Pointer instead of atomic.Value scylladb/scylla-go-driver
1 participant
@Kulezi