You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It might be better for wl/start and wl/restart to return a value, e.g. :ok, :started, :success, :restarted or a welcome string to communicate positively with the user.
This would be less ambiguous than 'nil'.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
light-matters
changed the title
wl/start (and restart etc.) should return a value on success
wl/start (and restart etc.) and package loads should return a value on success
Sep 7, 2024
Issue: An inexperienced user may not know what the return value of nil means.
Fix: Be explicit and return a map with `:status :ok` and perhaps additional info. E.g. wolfram version seems useful.
It might be better for wl/start and wl/restart to return a value, e.g. :ok, :started, :success, :restarted or a welcome string to communicate positively with the user.
This would be less ambiguous than 'nil'.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: