You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Should we keep multiple options after implementing a comma-separated style or obsolete it?
I will create the Helm Chart based on the current implementation (i.e., multiple options). So, I want schema-importer to keep multiple options in v3.x.
However, I think it's OK if it obsoletes multiple options in v4.x in the future (i.e., the backward incompatible update is acceptable in a major release).
Should be the name of the comma-separated style option --namespace as well?
I think there is no problem if we use the same name.
However, this is a very minor thing, but it might be better to use --namespaces (plural form) because this option can accept several namespaces.
FYI:
The following configurations related to the namespace in other ScalarDB tools adopt the comma-separated style.
Description
Currently,
schema-importer
accepts multiple--namespace
options to specify multiple namespaces, like below.However, other Scalar tools employ a comma-separated style to specify multiple options.
To keep consistency among the products, we should also allow a comma-separated style for schema-importer.
Considerations
--namespace
as well?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: