-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 131
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release 2.0.0 #316
Comments
@Philippus, @SethTisue Any chance this can happen? (prompted by #270) Ideally releasing against Dotty 3.0.0-M2 as well! |
I've opened a separate ticket for that: #334 This ticket can be about broader 1.2.0 planning |
Should it be 2.0.0, according to semantic versioning? |
1.2.0-M1 is published |
we're continuing to do 1.2.0-Mx releases as needed to support Scala 3 prereleases in the absence of any other input or opinions about the future, I guess I'd be inclined to wait until Scala 3.0.0 final is released, then go 1.2.0-RC1 and then 1.2.0 final with whatever we have. there haven't been any complaints about the milestones |
In light of scala/sbt-scala-module#111 I think we should also set a |
maybe it's better to go RC1 before Scala 3.0.0 final is released, as it seems unlikely that any further changes will land |
Scala 3.0.0-RC2 is out. I will release 1.2.0-RC1 today. |
1.2.0-RC1 is out |
backpublished 1.2.0-RC1 for Scala 3.0.0-RC3 |
I think @SethTisue will release 1.2.0 now that Scala 3.0.0 is released. As always, thank you! |
I'll try very hard to get to that today |
Should we make it 2.0.0 ? |
I'd asked that above, back in December, but I can't remember what my thinking was at the time. It should be 2.0 because we broke bincompat, is that right? (Sorry if we've been over this before, but I work in so many repos...) |
Yeah, we removed |
Looks like the planning is done and just the publishing remains: #386 |
@SethTisue Thanks for the release! FYI. I found one issue with the major version change from 1.x to 2.x (e.g., sbt 1.5.x shows an error with dependency eviction twitter/util#287), but I think the time will resolve this type of issue. A workaround is adding a setting like: ThisBuild / libraryDependencySchemes += "org.scala-lang.modules" %% "scala-parser-combinators" % "always" |
Yeah, I think that's as expected. |
@Philippus had you given this any thought...?
(thought prompted by #234)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: