-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 322
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Google search for 'scala' results, at least in some locations, highlights a moderate-quality and unflattering user question thread right under the main language page #1731
Comments
The problem reproduces for me. It links to https://users.scala-lang.org/t/why-scala-is-not-popular/9687, perhaps that link was shared and became popular on some platform? Here are all forum threads sorted by view count, the one in question is at position 9 https://users.scala-lang.org/latest?ascending=false&order=views. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
We could disallow this page in robots.txt to remove it from google index. But I'm not sure it's the best approach. |
Based on the advice at:
I did the following:
I confirmed that when you visit the site when you're not logged in, the category is invisible and if you try to visit the topic directly you get a "Oops! That page doesn’t exist or is private." page. So very likely this should take care of it, but I'm leaving the ticket open until we've confirmed that the search results change in the next re-indexing. |
@fsalvi do you have access to the Google Search Console for scala-lang.org? Would you be able to follow the instructions at https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/9689846?hl=en to fast-track the removal of this URL from their index? |
Yes. I did it. I don't know how long it will take... |
This is a rather unfortunate and unhelpful first sub-result returned on searching 'scala' on Google:
I don't know if there's a good way to de-emphasize this, but it's not the most essential information one wants to know when looking for Scala (even if one is taking a negative view of it).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: