You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I propose we support a new function defAsync that merely states the result is an asynchronous value (we could parameterize what an async result looks like).
Why?
If the user can tell sanctuary-def that a function is async, it could open up this library to moving type checking to a worker thread (in the browser), or a child process (in node). It gives sanctuary-def permission to do exhaustive checks on recursive types or complex constraints without blowing the stack, simply by recurring asynchronously.
If we can move type checking off the main thread, we could keep type checking on in production without experiencing jank in the UI.
We'd also potentially allow sanctuary-def to give us better verification of async results, by allowing sanctuary-def to traverse async results when they eventually arrive.
I'd be happy to tinker with this on another branch if it seems like something we may want. Even if doesn't work out, it could be an interesting experiment.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
An alternative to having a new definition function would be to annotate a type w/ an async flag. Then if a checked function has a return type that is async, Sanctuary could do its webworker magic.
I propose we support a new function
defAsync
that merely states the result is an asynchronous value (we could parameterize what an async result looks like).Why?
If the user can tell sanctuary-def that a function is async, it could open up this library to moving type checking to a worker thread (in the browser), or a child process (in node). It gives sanctuary-def permission to do exhaustive checks on recursive types or complex constraints without blowing the stack, simply by recurring asynchronously.
If we can move type checking off the main thread, we could keep type checking on in production without experiencing jank in the UI.
We'd also potentially allow sanctuary-def to give us better verification of async results, by allowing sanctuary-def to traverse async results when they eventually arrive.
I'd be happy to tinker with this on another branch if it seems like something we may want. Even if doesn't work out, it could be an interesting experiment.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: