Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add "optimized" argument to dof.create_rigid_body #129

Open
jkosinski opened this issue Aug 17, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

add "optimized" argument to dof.create_rigid_body #129

jkosinski opened this issue Aug 17, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@jkosinski
Copy link

Would be useful to pass optimized as a True/False option to the create_rigid_body method, so that:

    def create_rigid_body(self,
                          body,
                          nonrigid_parts = None,
                          max_trans=1.0,
                          max_rot=0.1,
                          nonrigid_max_trans = 0.1,
                          name=None,
                          optimized=True):
        ...
        rb.set_coordinates_are_optimized(optimized)
        ...
@cgreenberg
Copy link
Collaborator

If you don't want to optimize it, easier (and less confusing?) to just not pass the mover to Replica Exchange, no?

@jkosinski
Copy link
Author

Right, but what about conjugate gradient?
On Aug 21, 2015 9:47 PM, "Charles Greenberg" [email protected]
wrote:

If you don't want to optimize it, easier (and less confusing?) to just not
pass the mover to Replica Exchange, no?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#129 (comment).

@jkosinski
Copy link
Author

Ok, ignore this, since Ben just explained to me that CG doesn't deal with
rbs.
On Aug 21, 2015 10:00 PM, "Jan Kosinski" [email protected] wrote:

Right, but what about conjugate gradient?
On Aug 21, 2015 9:47 PM, "Charles Greenberg" [email protected]
wrote:

If you don't want to optimize it, easier (and less confusing?) to just
not pass the mover to Replica Exchange, no?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#129 (comment).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants