Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Merge returnn_training and returnn_rasr_training? #39

Open
christophmluscher opened this issue Feb 7, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Merge returnn_training and returnn_rasr_training? #39

christophmluscher opened this issue Feb 7, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
@christophmluscher

Comments

@christophmluscher
Copy link
Contributor

This function shares almost the same signature as returnn_training and does very similar things.
Would it be possible / desirable to only have one function, which then internally decides on ReturnnTrainingJob vs ReturnnRasrTrainingJob and does the handling based on *_corpus_key.

Originally posted by @michelwi in #30 (comment)
@christophmluscher christophmluscher self-assigned this Feb 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@christophmluscher christophmluscher

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@christophmluscher