We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Folk are using this and seems the maintainer @svartalf seems MIA
There seems to be at least one fork already by @djmitche / GothernburgBitFactory: actions-rs/audit-check#221 (comment) GothenburgBitFactory/taskwarrior#2830 (comment)
Here: https://github.com/GothenburgBitFactory/audit-check Addressing: actions-rs/audit-check#223
Would it be worthwhile to maintain a fork under GH org until the original maintainer is back
Or maybe we can just add the fork here: https://github.com/rust-secure-code/projects
In most basic form without any actions alternative always might be something like this - but it's pain to maintain vs action-ref:
- name: Cache cargo bin uses: actions/cache@v1 with: path: ~/.cargo/bin key: cargo-audit-v0.17.0 - name: Install cargo-audit run: | if [ ! -f $HOME/.cargo/bin/cargo-audit ]; then cargo install cargo-audit --vers 0.17.0 fi - name: cargo-audit run: cargo audit
There is ofc cargo-deny GH action too: https://github.com/EmbarkStudios/cargo-deny-action
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
cargo-deny
This might be a better question to post at https://github.com/RustSec as it's specifically RustSec-related.
I think it might make sense to fork the action under that org so @rustsec can manage maintenance.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Somewhat related issue here: rustsec/rustsec#303
I asked @Shnatsel about it yesterday and was supportive as well to under rustsec org
No branches or pull requests
Folk are using this and seems the maintainer @svartalf seems MIA
There seems to be at least one fork already by @djmitche / GothernburgBitFactory:
actions-rs/audit-check#221 (comment)
GothenburgBitFactory/taskwarrior#2830 (comment)
Here:
https://github.com/GothenburgBitFactory/audit-check
Addressing:
actions-rs/audit-check#223
Would it be worthwhile to maintain a fork under GH org until the original maintainer is back
Or maybe we can just add the fork here:
https://github.com/rust-secure-code/projects
In most basic form without any actions alternative always might be something like this - but it's pain to maintain vs action-ref:
There is ofc cargo-deny GH action too:
https://github.com/EmbarkStudios/cargo-deny-action
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: