You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Ask about user's opinion about the speed with which Rust evolves.
The previous question was just... bad. This variation is hopefully more clear. I also think that it makes sense to ask this as the first question in this segment about Rust features.
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: surveys/2024-annual-survey/questions.md
+17-11Lines changed: 17 additions & 11 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -290,6 +290,23 @@ Type: select all that apply (optional)
290
290
> in a separate question, though this is likely easier to find out through download
291
291
> numbers.
292
292
293
+
### What is your opinion on how fast Rust evolves?
294
+
295
+
We want to know if you are able to keep up with the speed of development of the Rust language.
296
+
297
+
Type: select one (optional)
298
+
299
+
- Rust is already too complex, it should not add or stabilize any more features.
300
+
- Rust changes too quickly, I wish it would slow down the pace of development.
301
+
- I am satisfied with the current pace of development.
302
+
- Rust changes too slowly, I wish it would add or stabilize features faster.
303
+
- I don't know or don't care.
304
+
305
+
> **justification**
306
+
>
307
+
> We want to find out if people prefer stability and fewer changes, or if they want to see more features being
308
+
> implemented or stabilized.
309
+
293
310
### In your opinion, how would you prioritise work on the following aspects of Rust?
294
311
295
312
Type: matrix (optional)
@@ -322,17 +339,6 @@ Priority:
322
339
>
323
340
> This question gathers data on the communities perceptions of certain aspects of Rust at this point in time.
324
341
325
-
### Do you think that unimplemented (or nightly only) features should be stabilised in Rust?
326
-
327
-
Type: select one (optional)
328
-
329
-
- I think that unimplemented features should be stabilised [`NEXT`](#which-unimplemented-or-nightly-only-features-are-you-looking-for-to-be-stabilized)
330
-
- I wish the Rust project to not add major new features (or slow down the pace of development) [`NEXT`](#which-of-these-problems-do-you-recall-encountering-within-the-last-year)
331
-
332
-
> **justification**
333
-
>
334
-
> We want to find out if people prefer stability and fewer changes, or if they want to see more features being stabilized.
335
-
336
342
### Which unimplemented or (nightly only) features are you looking for to be stabilized?
337
343
338
344
Please mention here features for the *Rust compiler* that are currently behind a feature gate (only available using an unstable/nightly release of the Rust compiler) or a feature that is missing and in your opinion would be beneficial to the Rust ecosystem or to your work. This list excludes other tooling around the compiler such as cargo, rustup, rustfmt, etc.
0 commit comments