Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spurious assertion in rustc_codegen_ssa/src/back/write.rs #87083

Closed
michaelwoerister opened this issue Jul 12, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Spurious assertion in rustc_codegen_ssa/src/back/write.rs #87083

michaelwoerister opened this issue Jul 12, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
A-spurious Area: Spurious failures in builds (spuriously == for no apparent reason) C-bug Category: This is a bug. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Comments

@michaelwoerister
Copy link
Member

There seems to be a race condition that sometimes triggers this assertion in CI builds:

assert_eq!(main_thread_worker_state, MainThreadWorkerState::Codegenning);

See #86965 (comment) for an example.

Let's start collecting instances of this issue here.

@michaelwoerister michaelwoerister added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. C-bug Category: This is a bug. labels Jul 12, 2021
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum added the A-spurious Area: Spurious failures in builds (spuriously == for no apparent reason) label Jul 12, 2021
@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented Jul 13, 2021

When I looked at this last time, it seemed:

There are other such assertions when other messages are received, maybe the state machine could contain other unexpected state transitions with respect to the main thread worker state ? (For example -- and I don't know if it's possible for this to happen -- while the main thread worker is LLVMing, receiving a Message::Token() would transition the main thread worker to idle, which could then trigger similar assertions if Message::Codegen{Done,Aborted,Complete} messages are then received)

@Enselic
Copy link
Member

Enselic commented Dec 20, 2023

Triage: The assert was removed in b00d0fa so let's close this as obsolete.

@Enselic Enselic closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Dec 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-spurious Area: Spurious failures in builds (spuriously == for no apparent reason) C-bug Category: This is a bug. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants