|
| 1 | +use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxHashMap; |
| 2 | +use rustc_errors::Applicability; |
| 3 | +use rustc_hir::{self as hir, ExprKind}; |
| 4 | +use rustc_lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass}; |
| 5 | +use rustc_session::{declare_lint_pass, declare_tool_lint}; |
| 6 | +use rustc_span::symbol::Symbol; |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +use if_chain::if_chain; |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +use crate::utils::{snippet, span_lint_and_sugg}; |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +declare_clippy_lint! { |
| 13 | + /// **What it does:** Checks for struct constructors where the order of the field init |
| 14 | + /// shorthand in the constructor is inconsistent with the order in the struct definition. |
| 15 | + /// |
| 16 | + /// **Why is this bad?** Since the order of fields in a constructor doesn't affect the |
| 17 | + /// resulted instance as the below example indicates, |
| 18 | + /// |
| 19 | + /// ```rust |
| 20 | + /// #[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq)] |
| 21 | + /// struct Foo { |
| 22 | + /// x: i32, |
| 23 | + /// y: i32, |
| 24 | + /// } |
| 25 | + /// let x = 1; |
| 26 | + /// let y = 2; |
| 27 | + /// |
| 28 | + /// // This assertion never fails. |
| 29 | + /// assert_eq!(Foo { x, y }, Foo { y, x }); |
| 30 | + /// ``` |
| 31 | + /// |
| 32 | + /// inconsistent order means nothing and just decreases readability and consistency. |
| 33 | + /// |
| 34 | + /// **Known problems:** None. |
| 35 | + /// |
| 36 | + /// **Example:** |
| 37 | + /// |
| 38 | + /// ```rust |
| 39 | + /// struct Foo { |
| 40 | + /// x: i32, |
| 41 | + /// y: i32, |
| 42 | + /// } |
| 43 | + /// let x = 1; |
| 44 | + /// let y = 2; |
| 45 | + /// Foo { y, x }; |
| 46 | + /// ``` |
| 47 | + /// |
| 48 | + /// Use instead: |
| 49 | + /// ```rust |
| 50 | + /// # struct Foo { |
| 51 | + /// # x: i32, |
| 52 | + /// # y: i32, |
| 53 | + /// # } |
| 54 | + /// # let x = 1; |
| 55 | + /// # let y = 2; |
| 56 | + /// Foo { x, y }; |
| 57 | + /// ``` |
| 58 | + pub INCONSISTENT_STRUCT_CONSTRUCTOR, |
| 59 | + style, |
| 60 | + "the order of the field init shorthand is inconsistent with the order in the struct definition" |
| 61 | +} |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +declare_lint_pass!(InconsistentStructConstructor => [INCONSISTENT_STRUCT_CONSTRUCTOR]); |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | +impl LateLintPass<'_> for InconsistentStructConstructor { |
| 66 | + fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, expr: &'tcx hir::Expr<'_>) { |
| 67 | + if_chain! { |
| 68 | + if let ExprKind::Struct(qpath, fields, base) = expr.kind; |
| 69 | + if let Some(def_id) = cx.qpath_res(qpath, expr.hir_id).opt_def_id(); |
| 70 | + let ty = cx.tcx.type_of(def_id); |
| 71 | + if let Some(adt_def) = ty.ty_adt_def(); |
| 72 | + if adt_def.is_struct(); |
| 73 | + if let Some(variant) = adt_def.variants.iter().next(); |
| 74 | + if fields.iter().all(|f| f.is_shorthand); |
| 75 | + then { |
| 76 | + let mut def_order_map = FxHashMap::default(); |
| 77 | + for (idx, field) in variant.fields.iter().enumerate() { |
| 78 | + def_order_map.insert(field.ident.name, idx); |
| 79 | + } |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | + if is_consistent_order(fields, &def_order_map) { |
| 82 | + return; |
| 83 | + } |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | + let mut ordered_fields: Vec<_> = fields.iter().map(|f| f.ident.name).collect(); |
| 86 | + ordered_fields.sort_unstable_by_key(|id| def_order_map[id]); |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | + let mut fields_snippet = String::new(); |
| 89 | + let (last_ident, idents) = ordered_fields.split_last().unwrap(); |
| 90 | + for ident in idents { |
| 91 | + fields_snippet.push_str(&format!("{}, ", ident)); |
| 92 | + } |
| 93 | + fields_snippet.push_str(&last_ident.to_string()); |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | + let base_snippet = if let Some(base) = base { |
| 96 | + format!(", ..{}", snippet(cx, base.span, "..")) |
| 97 | + } else { |
| 98 | + String::new() |
| 99 | + }; |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | + let sugg = format!("{} {{ {}{} }}", |
| 102 | + snippet(cx, qpath.span(), ".."), |
| 103 | + fields_snippet, |
| 104 | + base_snippet, |
| 105 | + ); |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | + span_lint_and_sugg( |
| 108 | + cx, |
| 109 | + INCONSISTENT_STRUCT_CONSTRUCTOR, |
| 110 | + expr.span, |
| 111 | + "inconsistent struct constructor", |
| 112 | + "try", |
| 113 | + sugg, |
| 114 | + Applicability::MachineApplicable, |
| 115 | + ) |
| 116 | + } |
| 117 | + } |
| 118 | + } |
| 119 | +} |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +// Check whether the order of the fields in the constructor is consistent with the order in the |
| 122 | +// definition. |
| 123 | +fn is_consistent_order<'tcx>(fields: &'tcx [hir::Field<'tcx>], def_order_map: &FxHashMap<Symbol, usize>) -> bool { |
| 124 | + let mut cur_idx = usize::MIN; |
| 125 | + for f in fields { |
| 126 | + let next_idx = def_order_map[&f.ident.name]; |
| 127 | + if cur_idx > next_idx { |
| 128 | + return false; |
| 129 | + } |
| 130 | + cur_idx = next_idx; |
| 131 | + } |
| 132 | + |
| 133 | + true |
| 134 | +} |
0 commit comments