Skip to content

Commit 54f450a

Browse files
Rollup merge of #114194 - thomcc:flushinline, r=cuviper
Inline trivial (noop) flush calls At work I noticed that `writer.flush()?` didn't get optimized away in cases where the flush is obviously a no-op, which I had expected (well, desired). I went through and added `#[inline]` to a bunch of cases that were obviously noops, or delegated to ones that were obviously noops. I omitted platforms I don't have access to (some tier3). I didn't do this very scientifically, in cases where it was non-obvious I left `#[inline]` off.
2 parents 1e3b1b4 + f3b73dd commit 54f450a

File tree

0 file changed

+0
-0
lines changed

    0 file changed

    +0
    -0
    lines changed

    0 commit comments

    Comments
     (0)